Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi7 Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Mi7 Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:INHERITORG, association with possibly notable bands or groups don't make the record company inherit notability and there is nothing in WP:NMUSIC or WP:NCORP that record labels have separate SNG, so this should be evaluated against NCORP, which I don't find the company meets the requirements. Graywalls (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: In additiont to the concerns raised by the nominator, I couldn't find any evidence that Charlie Winston, one of the musicians they claim is signed to them, has released anything through said label. Most of the other artists, only Discogs (which is unreliable, as it's user-generated) confirms an Mi7 release.  Kncny11  (shoot) 21:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete One Guardian article isn't enough to demonstrate notability. Nexus000 (talk) 02:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.