Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Merode


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Mia Merode

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sorry, but this does not appear to be a notable person. Her job is no guarantee for notability despite a possible claim to the contrary on my talk page, and there is no significant coverage (besides glitter) on her. Also--one wonders about the name "Sparklebug", given the year of Ms. Merode's birth... Drmies (talk) 20:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * This biography is somewhat suspect, given that it has nary a mention of a fairly important fundamental fact: this wasn't this person's stage name (our not even having the real name at all) a year ago. To aid in your searches for sources I reveal &hellip; ta-da! &hellip; that the earlier stage name was .  Yes, Dani California.  For what it's worth, my searches for sources under both names thus far have only found this person's life and work documented by herself.  (I had an example to provide, but it turns out to be on the URL blacklist.)  That's not trustworthy or objective enough documentation for supporting a Wikipedia article.  And the article itself as it stands lacks basic verifiability, with the sources cited therein not actually supporting the statements that they are hyperlinked to.  The model WWW site says nothing about demand.  The school staff biographies don't support the claim that this person ever attended the school. Uncle G (talk) 21:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Excellent work, Uncle. I found a few things to do in "her" article as well. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  16:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable. Fails WP:BIO --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.