Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Thunder (truck)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Miami Thunder (truck)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Individual monster trucks generally aren't notable. There is no substantial coverage of reliable sources and therefore fails WP:N. Tavix (talk) 04:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Hard to believe that someone made a Category:Defunct monster trucks (it's got three items), but nothing to indicate that this was ever notable. Maybe someone can make a list of defunct monster trucks and park this there. Mandsford (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There isn't even a List of monster trucks. Why would we create a fork of defunct ones when there isn't a parent article? Tavix (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Neither you nor I would create such a page, to be sure. I wouldn't put it past someone else to attempt it however.  Mandsford (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There was a List of monster trucks but it was deleted on January 19. •••Life of Riley (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete, not notable. Flyingcandyman (talk) 06:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't think this is notable enough to have an article of its own. Does Michael Schumacher's car have an article btw? ;)  C h a m a l  talk 15:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If you are referring to his F1 car(s), then yes they are notable enough for articles due to Formula One being internationally notable. The problem for the Miami Thunder is that it receives virtually no media coverage to gain notability, so it doesn't meet WP's criteria. Flyingcandyman (talk) 02:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.