Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miapolis (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Proposed_tall_buildings_and_structures. Nakon 03:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Miapolis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article still has no sources. It implies that there exists a building that is 975 meters tall (which would be the tallest building in the world), and that it will open in 2017. If this were credible claim, it would need to be sourced extensively. Also, the Proposed tall buildings and structures should at least have more notability than this project, and/or have some chance of actually getting built. ThoseArentMuskets (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 *  Redirect - Redirect to Proposed tall buildings and structures only as long as the building is mentioned there. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - moved AfD to 2nd nom page. ansh 666 03:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The project was debunked as a failure five years ago, and never received genuine significant coverage before that. If I sent out a bunch of press releases about my plan to build a 200 story building, would my plan be notable? If that was it, the answer would be "No", even if a handful of sources credulosly reprinted my press releases. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 *  Reply - If it should not have a redirect, it should not be mentioned at Proposed tall buildings and structures. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed. It probably shouldn't be listed there. Proposed tall buildings and structures is a strange mix of actual cancelled projects, pipe dreams, and science fiction concepts. There doesn't seem to be any restrictions on what goes there, I suppose I could probably just make up a 3 km tall building and put it there. ThoseArentMuskets (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Proposed tall buildings and structures. There are definitely sources out there, but even if the number of sources weren't all local and did manage to satisfy WP:GNG, I don't think it could sustain a stand-alone article. But there's enough to include at the list and thus redirect there. e.g. luxurylaunches.com, miami new times, architecture scope... but it looks like "Miapolis" has been used for somewhat broader meanings in talking about building up this or that area of Miami... &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 02:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.