Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mic(ism)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Avi 05:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Mic(ism)

 * Not notable as it doesn't meet WP:CORP. Nearly nonsense, so it will be hard to clean up. No notable people involved. Really just corporate. Mikeblas 03:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP and WP:ADS. Only 783 Google results --TBC TaLk?!? 04:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ADS and WP:CORP. Not so sure about WP:NPOV, but that'd just be another nail in the coffin. --Coredesat talk 08:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Delete. Doesn't meet guidelines. JPD (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * May not meet WP:CORP, but is hardly nonsense. People involved may not be notable to the general public, but are well known and respected by those involved in beatbox and hip hop culture: article about mic(ism) featured in Scandinavian hip hop magazine, Kingsize. When composing our Wiki article we researched other Wiki articles about small clothing labels and kept in line with those. They haven't been targeted for deletion.  Furthermore, the IBA section of the article is not corporate.  Added by  Mic(ism) at 1:53, June 27, 2006.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.