Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mic Diggy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Mic Diggy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article lacking subject notability. Article's text was originally on https://micdiggy.wordpress.com/about-mic-diggy/, but was removed by author before Admin confirmed the G12. (This was prety much confirmed by .) I was also assume this is a coi given the change to the subject's website. red dogsix (talk) 06:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CatcherStorm    talk   07:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   CatcherStorm    talk   07:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   CatcherStorm    talk   07:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. An autobiography promoting the creator. The article indicates that his [first] album was released 3 days ago, so unless notable for something else, we can presume this is the typical up and coming next big thing. The references do not show substantive treatment in reliable, secondary sources that are independent. And most are not being used as actual references at all. Rather, they are just the front pages of websites verifying the existence of something mentioned in the text, but in which this topic does not appear. Note that the profile at Lusakatimes is user-generated; a site that "provides a platform for any Zambian who want their article published..." Meanwhile, at least the low hanging fruit of Google Books and News return zero results.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned, none of this suggests a better notable and improvable article for the guidelines. Notifying local user . SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Another vanity page with no evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 07:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability.  → Call me  Razr   Nation  06:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.