Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micah Armstrong (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per criterion 1. Nominator indicated a desire to withdraw with this edit. (Non-admin closure) StAnselm (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Micah Armstrong
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page isn't an article. It's two lines of text, two references and a link to the man's website. It looks like more of a subversive ad. I suggest that the page be deleted. Alternately, this page should only be kept if it is re-written to provide a neutral article explaining who he is and what his positions are. Saying he was a teacher who travels with his wife isn't notable at all. Jsderwin (talk) 01:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree that the article is in sorry shape, but the subject is clearly notable. In fact, I found two articles published specifically about him just this month. I added some information about his beliefs to the article, so at least it's longer than two lines. Rklawton (talk) 02:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It looks like there have been a number of articles published about him in reliable sources, including a profile by the Associated Press. The article is now fully sourced and reads neutral, I fail to see a reason for deletion here. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Article has now been fixed and is well-sourced and neutral. StAnselm (talk) 00:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.