Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micah Meisner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Micah Meisner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No idea about what it says about notability, but Google shows little more than blogs. Jamesx12345 18:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article is not in good shape, but the subject is notable. He has 4 Juno nominations, and won for 2 of them (see ).  Juno Awards of 2005 confirmed with this Billboard item. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, even if the subject is notable, you still need references for the article; but I would have made it notable if someone would have found citations for this article. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - AFD is not cleanup. The addition of sourcing is an editorial action that does not require deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  00:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to be quite a bit of coverage available in Google News archives including this bit in a Wired story. Article needs work, but the subject appears to be quite notable and to have been recognized with nominations and awards within his field. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.