Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Adams (graphic designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Michael Adams (graphic designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparent autobiography of an obscure teacher, marketer and graphic designer. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. The milking of every passing reference out there, makes it clear this is a case of WP:VANISPAM. It's fair to assume there isn't any in-depth coverage of him given what this detailed article is based on. Maybe he was mentioned in relation to Candy the Cow, but if the press coverage was anything like the TV one, I doubt that anyone paid much attention to him. (That clip doesn't mention him at all.) The Military Brats of America might be remotely notable (and his only interviews with the press were about that), but it was indeed outside his career, so if the org was notable, a separate page should be created about that. (It seems more like it was a one-off WP:EVENT type press spike.) Someone not using his real name (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Previous !vote sums matters up well. Agricola44 (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.