Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Alden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica1000 11:29, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Michael Alden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No individual notability. Producer is an  administrative function, not an artistic one. Some of these works are major, but non e of them are his in any creative sense. The referneces are to the works, and list him in the credits; they are not about him, or his role, and they do not shown importance for him.  DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Producer is an artistic role, and has creative input on many aspects of a production. The fact that they vet and hire the creative team, raise money, and find distribution for a film surely merits importance to the resulting production, as it would not exist without a Producer. One of the references is an article published about him and his role as producer on a variety of projects. What more is needed to avoid deletion of this entry? Kylemetzger 11 (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I was intensely vetted by Wikipedia while creating the page that Wikipedia accepted on May 28, 2013 as biography of living persons. No alterations have been made to the page with the exception of the addition of a photo. Wikipedia required appropriate links to confirm the content of the page was factual. Those links were provided and the page was published. I am not sure what additional confirmations may now be needed for the biography but in response to DGG statement that Producer is an administrative function, not an artistic one the none of the projects are mine in any creative sense is inaccurate, however, as descriptive commentary was not allowed, I relied on the Wikipedia definition of a Producer. What is the basis for claiming no individual notability as a reason for deletion in this instance? And what is the definition of notability as it would relate to a requirement for continued inclusion in the publication? Thank you Mdjared (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.