Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Armstrong (human resources)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Michael Armstrong (human resources)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable (as tagged since 2008) -- only thing close to notability is his publications, but those are all from Kogan Page, a company Armstrong works for (see Kogan_Page) —Eustress talk 03:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete On my watchlist for some reason. Mostly per nom. Protonk (talk) 03:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wasn't able to find anything that shows that he's notable per WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Tokyogirl79
 * Delete. He isn't responsible for any major new concept and thus fails WP:AUTHOR. His book is readily available, but I can't find any sources making reference to it apart from sites selling it, so I don't think that's relevant either. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 05:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling suggests they don't exist.  Msnicki (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete it seemingly implies notability which may be enough to keep it however its poorly written showing it is mostly an ad for a dubious topic.LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.