Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Beagley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. However if you want to work on this (or anyone else), I'm happy to provide it in draft. Star  Mississippi  15:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Michael Beagley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability found, either passing mentions or sources which aren't independent. Fram (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Scotland. Fram (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 16:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 16:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Draft Of course there is evidence of notability, in all those cites, I only saw one good one. People use their words so badly these days, does a biography qualify under notability guidelines would be a nicer view. However he is young, has potential. Why people are so averse to football players and the football project these days I do not know. Govvy (talk) 22:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * About half of this website is articles about footballers, we're not exactly averse to having them on Wikipedia. If you've got evidence of Wikipedia notability, provide it. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.