Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bibl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Michael Bibl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:NARTIST. Google searches do not emit anything suggesting significant coverage, hence, fails WP:GNG. Hitro talk 14:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: A CV-like article on a working graphic designer, supported by links to routine listings. The article makes no claim to notability and searches are finding social media listings but nothing to indicate that the subject has attained WP:BASIC / WP:ANYBIO notability. AllyD (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I concur with AllyD (talk). Google searches reveal very little information beyond social profiles and there are no third party sources that suggest this person meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Quorum816 (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete GNG fail. A graphic designer who has a job, like 500,000 other graphic designers. Not notable.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete dont have any significant coverage, failure of WP:GNG Reddragon7 (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.