Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bric


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. A redirect would be okay, if someone wants to make one. Mango juice talk 05:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Michael Bric
This guy isn't notable enough for his own article. This information is already in two, possibly three, other articles. JD 17:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events
 * Delete per nom. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - this guy made headlines for a week or two across Australia. He engaged in televised sexual harassment/indecent assault. - Richardcavell 01:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Why doesn't Ashley Cox have an article of his own then? --talk to JD wants e-mail 12:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You can go write one if you want. All of the housemates have segments of the BB06 article. The two mentioned here - Cox and Bric - had more media coverage than the eventual winner. - Richardcavell 01:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I know each housemate has a section, as I've been a contributor to that article. That doesn't mean that every ex-housemate should have their own article.  Peter Corbett, winner of Big Brother 2002, doesn't have his own article.  I don't see many housemates being worthy of having their own article, and John Bric passes only one of the guidelines that are on WP:BIO:
 * Even then, all the news reports blew the story way out of proportion so that networks could increase their ratings. Look at it from a realistic perspective: did he do anything that warrants inclusion in his own article when it's already on the Big Brother Australia article and quite extensively in the Big Brother 2006 article?  --talk to JD wants e-mail 10:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The subject is a thug who showed himself up on national TV as such. Quite right he should be charged, and no, don't have articles on all or any who have engaged in indecent assaults, televised or no per WP:NOT, not even a list. Delete per WP:BIO: Remember that "Multiple similar stories describing a single day's news event only count as one coverage" Ohconfucius 03:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Leaning to delete. Oneshot character who didn't make much happen on a reality show doesn't really seem to pass WP:BIO. I say redirect to appropriate article, include there. Luna Santin 22:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect (or Delete) to relevant BB Australia series article. Does not deserve an article on his own, and the content is only repeating what should be in the main article. The JPS talk to me  22:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.