Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Budd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Michael Budd

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable actor and filmmaker. Previously deleted at Michael budd and Michaelbudd. Minor credits and no substantial reliable source coverage. Only references again are IMDb-style entries. Still fails WP:NACTOR and GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete working actor, but I don't see anything that would pass our guidelines... very minor unnamed roles, TV commercials, and the like. Tellingly, the movie he's supposedly 'best known' for hasn't been released yet... and he's 13th-billed for it, according to IMDB. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ENT. unremarkable career. LibStar (talk) 00:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, mostly bit parts and other minor work. Lankiveil (speak to me) 19:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:G4 While another version was recently speedied deleted per WP:A7 as being a duplictae of THIS one, this one should have been speedied deleted too as a WP:G4 recreation of the one deleted per an AFD just six weeks before its recreation.  But even if not speedied here, the rationale I offered at Articles for deletion/Michaelbudd just 4 months ago still applies... this one is still simply Too Soon.  Rarely do appearances in music videos or commercials create a sourcable notability. His film career fails WP:ENT and a lack of coverage fails WP:GNG.  If or when this changes, we might consider an article, but not a repeat or under a different version of this name.  I'd be okay with it being returned to its author should he ask, so he can then hope that Budd finally gets coverage upon the release of additonal projects.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.