Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Connely


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ nomination withdrawn as article has been speedy-redirected back to the prior election by another editor. Bearcat (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Michael Connely

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a politician not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. As always, unelected candidates for political office do not get articles on that basis per se -- the notability test at NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates qualify for articles only if either (a) they already had some other basis for notability that would already have gotten them an article anyway, or (b) they can show credible grounds for why their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater and more enduring notability than most other people's candidacies. But this is written more like a campaign brochure than an encyclopedia article, and is referenced to two primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and two hits of purely run of the mill campaign coverage, which is not enough to establish that he would satisfy either of the conditions for the permanent notability of an unelected candidate. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat, but nothing here is already grounds for an article now. Note as well that this title previously existed as a redirect to the first election that he already ran in and lost, until being turned into a standalone article within the past two days on the basis of his new candidacy — so restoring the original redirect, or repointing it to the current election, would also be options. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nebraska. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom; very fluffy piece with little to no evidence of notability currently. No objection to draftifying if consensus is that it is just a case of WP:TOOSOON. But it would need to be edited and sourced before publishing. LizardJr8 (talk) 16:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is nothing more than a 2021 electioneering bio for "an unknown political newcomer" He didn't win, so this article has no real purpose on Wikipedia. — Maile  (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * To be fair, the attempted basis for creation was that he's running again in another election now. That, of course, isn't grounds for an article to exist any more than his failure to win a previous election is, but still should be clarified nonetheless. Bearcat (talk) 18:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Military.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: PROMO for a political candidate. Selling seeds as a youth isn't notable, rest is simply a retelling of his life story. This isn't suitable for wikipedia. Oaktree b (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.