Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Conner Humphreys (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Michael Conner Humphreys
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject epically fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Not even close to being notable. Previous version of article was deleted at AfD for the same reason, but CSD G4 was declined. Safiel (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. WP:ENT requires significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Humphreys has one less-than-significant role to his credit and has since retired (save an unknown role in a non-notable production). - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - First and foremost, he meets WP:GNG. He's still receiving significant coverage in reliable sources in 2015, even for more than Forrest Gump . --TTTommy111 (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails Notability, GNG and ENT. is just one-off trivia, not significa.  Quis separabit?  19:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How is this trivia? It is a featured article about his life, not just about his part with the movie. I guess I am confused here. Is that article in depth coverage and is the Daily Mail a reliable source? Also, he doesn't have to meet WP:ENT if he meets WP:GNG --TTTommy111 (talk) 04:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I want to keep this article, but there just isn't enough there to meet the notability guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.