Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael D. Sullivan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn  - little bit of Afd on an unsourced bio and we get a sourced bio. I'm convinced that what we have now is sufficient. Good result all around - Peripitus (Talk) 22:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Michael D. Sullivan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Journalist's biography (written apparently by a relative) with no significant claim to notability. While the article mentions winning awards, I cannot see anything out there of great renown, and it does not specify which awards. Does not appear to meet the biographical notability standards Peripitus (Talk) 23:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: I don't think living with a giant half-wolf makes you notable. Mattg82 (talk) 23:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Subject is clearly notable as a quick web search revealed. That it didn't assert subject's notability has been addressed. Vulture19 (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Question What is the protocol for removing COI and unreferenced tags while an article is up for AfD? TIA Vulture19 (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: He is a senior correspondent for a major news organization and has won some seemingly notable awards. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.