Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael De Santa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Grand Theft Auto V. Salvio 13:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Michael De Santa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The notability here is entirely inherited, both from Grand Theft Auto V and Trevor Philips. The "Character design" section (almost entirely copied from Development of Grand Theft Auto V) consists of seven sources: four about the game, and three about Trevor, all with peripheral mentions of Michael. The "Reception" section has one useful quote from a game review, but the two others are simply about his relationship with—or comparison to—Trevor (one of which literally comes from a review of Trevor). All other sources are primary, and the majority of the article is just a plot description. Besides a brief analysis in a book chapter, there is not enough commentary on Michael to justify a separate article. The character is not independently notable. See also the AfD for the characters list. – Rhain  ☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. –  Rhain  ☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. –  Rhain  ☔ 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 07:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTINHERITED. has excellently gone through the sources and I agree.  soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. About 2/3 of the sources are from the game itself, which is a big red flag. The rest are mostly trivial coverage. Spicy (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Grand Theft Auto V as this is a plausible search term and would be more beneficial than outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom-- most of the actual sources here are about Trevor, *not* about Michael, and notability is inherited.  Nomader  ( talk ) 14:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Only passing mentions in sources at best, with nothing significant to write an article that meets the WP:GNG. Jontesta (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.