Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Elad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Michael Elad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Once one removes the self promoting material that the has been added this individual does not meet WP:BIO nor does he WP:NPROF, a google search did not come up with any Reliable Secondary sources on this individual VViking Talk Edits 14:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly meets NPROF. IEEE Fellow with h-index of 77 - scholar stats for Michael Elad. Regarding the promotional, un-sourced, and quite possible (per user name adding it) autobiographical material - we could just roll-back to May version or selectively accept part of it.Icewhiz (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not only meets NPROF, but also meets WP:AUTHOR as he has been selected a few times among Thomson-Reuters most influential researches world wide and seems to have more than 3K influencial citations . comment added by Jsulam (talk • contribs) 16:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)  — Jsulam (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 79.180.48.45 (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- meets WP:AUTHOR and WP:NPROF --EC Racing (talk) 17:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Page history shows that page was created by a reliable editor as a stub because Elad is a IEEE Fellow, which is the kind of honour that qualifies you for a page. and as per User:Icewhix's citation of his h-index.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Clearly meets AUTHOR and NPROF. Needs cleanup, not deletion. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per citation counts on Google scholar that are heavy even for computer science (9 papers with >1000 citations each, WP:PROF) and the IEEE Fellowship (WP:PROF). AfD is not for cleanup. —David Eppstein (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a clear pass of the notability guidelines for academics. The article may well need rewording to make it present information from a more neutral point of view, but AfD is not for cleanup, and any needed cleanup can be done by editing, there is no reason to delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep pass WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.