Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Enright (filmmaker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as G10. No matter how you slice it, reporting an unconvicted allegation against a living person violates WP:PERP. Jclemens (talk) 04:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Michael Enright (filmmaker)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notable only for one event, the outcome of which isn't yet known. If anything, probably belongs in an article about the event itself, an article we don't (yet?) have, rather than at his own name. Exploding Boy (talk) 03:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete An obvious and highly prejudicial BLP1E. Hopefully this will be snowed to avoid the article having to sit around for seven days to the subject's detriment.--Mkativerata (talk) 03:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's at least the 3rd article that's been created about him today; the others have been speedied for one reason or another. Exploding Boy (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete dude (allegedly) gets drunk, does something dumb, gets arrested. No evidence whatsoever this is anything that could even remotely be in an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am opposed to deletion prior to expiration of the seven day period.  I have found that in cases like this, the subject's wikipedia article is usually the least biased source of information out there, because it is so highly watched, etc.  Others may disagree with my view, but when i google michael enright news articles, you get much more horrible and biased stuff than our standards would ever allow.  As to the merits, the event itself seems to merit coverage somewhere, but its not clear where.  Perhaps under Park51, but its hard to know for sure yet.--Milowent • talkblp-r  03:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete already. This article has already been speedily deleted more than three times today (various titles). I'm not going to list all of the problems here since they are patently obvious. Frankly it should be speedily deleted again, if just for WP:NOTNEWS.   Thorncrag    03:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is worth mentioning in the Park51 article however. Capitalistroadster (talk) 04:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.