Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Essany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. JeremyA 03:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Michael Essany
Autobiography. Subject is only 23 or 24, username is "messany" - identical to subject of article. Anabanana459 04:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * subject of article has some notability, an E! talk show, but seems that is only possible reason to keep the article, delete per WP:BIO J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    04:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * per disscussion below week keep J\/\/estbrook   Talk  VSCA    15:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, he has an IMDb entry (added link), has his own show, and appeared on Late Night with Jay Leno. Gilliamjf 05:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, it's bad form to write an article about yourself, but he's got his own TV show and an IMDB entry, which make him notable, clearly. Also, his age is irrelevant. I've seen notable 11-year-olds. -- Mgm|(talk) 13:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as above. Evil Eye 14:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep:at first glance I though I was going to vote for delete. I'm a little dissapointed.  Though it is bad faith to have your own autobiography I don't really see anything wrong with this article.  According to WP:BIO there is however a question of what is notable.  He does past the google test. however I am hesitant on the 100 year test -- In 100 years time will anyone without a direct connection to the individual find the article useful?  Another key element to look at is the WP:BIO:
 * Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Notability can be determined by:
 * Multiple features in popular culture publications such as Vogue, GQ, Elle, FHM or national newspapers
 * A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following
 * An independent biography
 * Name recognition
 * Commercial endorsements
 * These elements should be discused in the article. I believe it is possible for this to be included.  I also believe that this is an example of failing to discuss the issue on the appropriate talk page for the article.  (one of the first steps for resolving a bad article)  --CylePat 15:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - Essany is notable for having a successful cable talk show before he had graduated from college. It's not well discussed in the article but I'll look for references.  Agreed that it's bad form to write or edit an article about yourself, but he is notable nonetheless. Tim Pierce 16:00, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. If written in a neutral tone, I see nothing wrong with starting your own autobiographical article, given that it meets our established criteria for notability and verifiability.  Even Jimmy Wales has tailored his own article on Wikipedia several times over.  As for this article, it appears to be notable enough for inclusion based upon WP:BIO.  Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.