Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael F. Rehill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by, per CSD:A7. (non-admin closure) ——  SerialNumber  54129  18:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Michael F. Rehill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Kleuske (talk) 12:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:26, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 *  Delete  Not notable: One source is an obituary on someone else, and the other is self-published.  Orville1974  (talk) 13:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete or Weak Delete - WP:JUDGE does not indicate municipal judges are usually notable, and I could find no further sources indicating notability. I was considering bringing this to AfD myself. However, his involvement in at least one relatively high profile case leaves me open to the possibility I've missed something, but I can only find passing mentions. MarginalCost (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.