Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Feeney, MBE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Michael Feeney, MBE

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Is not a notable person (see: Notability) and in my opinion is little more than a vanity article. Exiledone (talk) 22:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and rescue. MBE is a pretty high honor -- when The Beatles got theirs, it was major news.  There are lots of sources, see this editorial or check the links above.  It is an ugly mess, but that can be fixed. Bearian (talk) 19:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Won a notable award. Those winning the awards are given news coverage, Google news finding three straight away, although the BBC doesn't have more than a sentence about him winning.   D r e a m Focus  23:16, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.  Snotty Wong   prattle 04:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per User:Bearian and User:Dream Focus. J I P  &#124; Talk 05:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment if kept, the article should have ", MBE" removed from the title as such honorifics are not normally included in the title itself -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree - but we need a way to differentiate it from the other two Michael Feeneys see Feeney Thruxton (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I have started 'wikification'. There are plenty of refs around and I agree that an MBE makes this an article worthy of rescue effort Thruxton (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Well referenced article, notable due to coverage and MBE. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 15:53, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.