Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Flanagan (tennis)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Michael Flanagan (tennis)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable as a tennis player and definitely not notable as a financial analyst. His ATP page shows that he never cracked the top 700 in singles or top 400 in doubles and earned only 4K$ in career prize money. He fared a bit better as a junior and college player but nothing that generates the kind of in-depth coverage necessary to pass WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, has received no significant coverage and doesn't meet GNG. --JonnyDKeen (talk) 19:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. No indication of notability either as an athlete or as a businessperson. Does not appear to meet GNG, and no substantive sources on which to base a BLP. -- Kinu t/c 20:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 08:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.