Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Green (Celebrity Wine and Spirits Consultant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Michael Green (Celebrity Wine and Spirits Consultant)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Has been PRODed twice already. Fails notability at WP:BIO. A few links are provided but there is no evidence the subject of the article has received the coverage in independent reliable sources required by WP:GNG. This Michael Green is not returned by Ghits. Kudpung (talk) 12:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: Changing the Google News Archive search from "Michael Green (Celebrity Wine and Spirits Consultant)" to +"Michael Green" +"wine expert" brings up some sources that could establish notability, such as a Toronto Star article and a brief mention in The New York Times. I'm not sure that they do establish notability, but if the article is kept, these would certainly be better references to include than the Facebook and YouTube refs in there now. 28bytes (talk) 01:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete at best I can find a few vox pop comments by the subject, but nothing about the subject. Nuttah (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.