Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Grieves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. A merge can be discussed on the article talkpage. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Michael Grieves

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NPROF Bushxingu (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bushxingu (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. This editor just started editing today, made 10 edits and then started deleting articles. Jacona (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Definitely not delete. Merge to Digital twin with redirect if that's all he's notable for. There's additional info in this article that could be in Digital twin.Jahaza (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Not my area but leaning keep. There are two papers over 1000 citations in Google Scholar (1236,1018), another two highly cited (596,226) and a further three (total of seven) over 100. Not all the highly cited works appear to be about Digital twin. Examining this and the other AfDs brought by the nominator, they don't seem to be in good faith. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Swift keep. Grieves's work on digital twins is very well known. The article isn't fantastic, and could do with more references, but Grieves is definitely notable in his own right. I wouldn't even merge it into Digital twin: he is notable for work on product lifecycle management and other stuff, too.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.