Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Guilfoyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to William Guilfoyle. (non-admin closure) f eminist 12:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Michael Guilfoyle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A7 declined, which is reasonable, but this article nonetheless provides no basis for notability outside of the local vicinity. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to William Guilfoyle, where there'll be just enough in the way of RS to justify a sentence about William's father. The local historian who wrote the blue plaque account has done a sterling job of inferring Guilfoyle's life from limited evidence (we'd certainly call it WP:OR if he'd done it here), but it doesn't demonstrate notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to William Guilfoyle as per Chiswick Chap. Article has no basis for notability and would better provide information within the William Guilfoyle article. Pagliaccious (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge to William Guilfoyle. His only potential notability is inherited from his son.  This is the normal solution in such cases.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.