Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hüter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 13:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Michael Hüter

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are no reliable sources availabe for this person. He is not well-known. --ZemanZorg (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Keep. Some sources, such as the articles from Focus Online, are generally considered reliable. Most other sources are at least not considered unreliable. For other sources, such as his personal website or YouTube videos, we have a source tag. However, these sources are not a problem with regard to neutrality if you look at what they are used.

He is one of the most famous school critics and unschooling proponents in the German-speaking world.--Maxeto0910 (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - What is the subject notable for? There is no assertion of notability in any reliable sources that I can find. -- A Rose Wolf  19:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peter303x (talk) 08:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, apparently self-published author, complete absence of reliable sources. The FOCUS pages are articles by the subject. Fails WP:GNG. —Kusma (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Kusma. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.