Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Harrell

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 15:15, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Michael_Harrell
The very definiton of vanity --Preisler 21:09, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, I concur. Inter 21:46, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, "extraordinarily handsome" is as vain as you can get. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:50, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. —Mar·ka·ci: 2005-02-19 21:52 Z
 * Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:11, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another vanity-filled article that makes me sigh and ask "Who bloody cares?" Zzyzx11 00:33, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 01:47, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)