Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Herlache


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The lack of coverage by independent reliable sources has not been addressed. J04n(talk page) 17:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Michael Herlache

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced biography with unsubstantiated claims about a seemingly non-notable person. After checking four archives, the only sources that I found were one press release and several newspaper mentions that he was on some honor rolls. The sources in the article are one press release and two publications that the himself subject wrote. - MrX 21:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The individual has just recieved Political Asylum having come from the US, in Brazil and Peru. This is what is called history. He has just authored two of the most important texts that have been written as it related to natural science and natural morality. He also owns a private equity fund that is raising $2.5 bn for infrastructure and economic development in the developing world. This individual is already one of the most influential people on the planet that you are just now hearing about and will in fact be the most influential individual period, in a relatively short period of time. I suggest you do your research more thoroughly here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.13.138.140 (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — 201.13.138.140 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete Other than a press release, no indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Safiel (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable autobiography with piss-poor sourcing, and no better sources found after a cursory search. His "influential texts" are self-published e-books. Hairhorn (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.138.250 (talk) 23:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.