Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hill (21st century composer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:16, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Michael Hill (21st century composer)
Similar to the Michael Hill article mentioned above and nominated for deletion, article appears to admit to being NN and after a quick search on Yahoo, no listings of this composer could be located. Dates of birth / death in article give the appearance he died at age 14. Likely a joke article. --Ataricodfish 03:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't delete- I am aware of the group pish posh and there information can be easily located.Being that he died so young, it is hard to find information on the ninternet. They also were very esoteric and have more of a cult following than a mainstream internet one. I don't think's its fair he should be deletead just because you cant find information. If you cantact me i would be happy to direct you to the people closest to him and his family( who wn the irhgts to his hundreds of composistions and contributions from such a young age.
 * Comment Despite this, Hill remains nonnotible.  I've tried several searches, including one for "Michael Hill" and "Pish-Posh" on Yahoo!, and obtain 5 hits, and only related to this article or completely unrelated .    As a musician, Hill does not qualify per WP:Music for inclusion in Wikipedia.  As well, the article fails WP:V, since no information can be located to confirm the article.  Per WP:V, "If an article topic has no reputable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic." --Ataricodfish 03:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:MUSIC.-- blue 520  04:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Quatloo 05:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn, fails WP:MUSIC, most probaly a hoax. --Ter e nce Ong 11:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly speedy? KillerChihuahua?!? 20:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.