Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hogg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. From the opposition, it is argued that notability is clearly established through Google Scholar. I believe that based on the impact of the subject's works, notability is established. I have no prejudice against speedy renomination, however. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Michael Hogg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 15.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  23:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. What did you do to try to establish notability? I looked on Google Scholar, and got blown away. The top three results give 6082, 2330 and 1390 citations respectively. For an h-index, it would seem, of 77. StAnselm (talk) 20:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Stunning cites in GS as above. Nominator is reminded that persons who show that they are not able to edit Wikipedia competently may have their editing privileges withdrawn. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.