Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holland (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Michael Holland (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO - "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." Zero independent coverage in RS, article created by a pair of SPAs, very much redolent of WP:UPE. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the article already has coverage in multiple reliable independent sources such as a review in Pop Matters here, Dallas Observer here and coverage in Indy Week here and here which has a full editorial staff as shown here so there is enough coverage for WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Perhaps the bands he's in are more notable? I'm looking at this strictly about Holland himself. He's had his music reviewed in No Depression, PopMatters twice, and in the Dallas Observer. I can't find much else, maybe because a Broadway musician shares his name. Those do qualify him through general notability guidelines, but, reviews can only go so far. I don't consider anything else sourced in that article qualifying for GNG, only WP:BASIC. Missvain (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this article does remain, we need to crop his wife out of that picture. I also requested permissions via Commons. Missvain (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Harriet Walter's sourcing, passes WP:ANYBIO (esp. see multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability).. ——  Serial  12:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.