Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Bowman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Michael J. Bowman
Dear editors- yes, I entered the article myself, but I need to learn the proper Wikipedia format, relevant links, etc... in my defense the entry is as relevant as Logan Whitehurst or Jim Shelly (musician). I undertsand if you have to delete the current version. Thanks- MJB
 * Good on you for not trying a "keep" vote. AfD-nominated articles are judged by the existing policies and guidelines, including WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. As there are a lot of "a topic is notable if ..." type clauses, and no two topics are identical, it's always best not to try and compare pages, especially ones with borderline notability. I hope you stick around, if you are indeed MJB you should have a lot to contribute  Dei zio  22:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Please don't take the vote as a commentary on you. It's very big of you to cede to wiki consensus and I do hope you stick around and contribute what you know. --Mmx1 01:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Pretty sure this is out-and-out non-notable bio; but there's a lot of bio and I fear some notability I can't see lurking in the article. ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 20:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete As A7, doesn't assert notability. --Mmx1 21:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe just avoids speedy but google for "Michael J Bowman" +punk goes for 61 unique / 88 total.  Dei zio  01:46, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete About as notable as I am. Fishhead64 07:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.