Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Easley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per WP:SNOW and meets WP:PROF criterion 6 (non-admin closure)  Jay Jay What did I do? 03:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Michael J. Easley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subjects fails to meet relevant notability guidelines (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOT). While there is one source mentioning the subject, I believe that is negated by WP:NOT. Basileias (talk) 11:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete (see note below where I changed my vote) - I would to vote to keep this article, but unless someone can locate more acheivements I don't think there is much notability. He did write one book and part of another. However, both received next to no reviews. Bill Pollard (talk) 13:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:N not established.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The one guideline not mentioned was WP:PROF, and it easily meets Criterion 6 - "highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution". MBI is an institution of over 80 full-time faculty members (600 employees altogether), so it definitely qualifies. StAnselm (talk) 23:49, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I read the WP:PROF guideline. It clearly states one who holds the highest elected or appointed position of a major learning institution is notable. Moody is a major and very notable institution. I must therefore change my vote to keep. Bill Pollard (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #6 (highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society).--Eric Yurken (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- president of a significant theological institute counts for WP:PROF:C6. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Any Presidnet of Moody Bible Institute would be notable. This is an important academic institution.  I presume it only teaches theology and related subjects, so that it would not be on the scale of a typical university.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.