Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J. Wolf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Michael J. Wolf
AfDs for this article:
 * Articles for deletion/Michael Wolf


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously deleted, jack of all trades businessman. Lots of profiles, puff references, standard notices of start/leaving jobs and PR. Fails WP:BIO.  scope_creep Talk  12:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously deleted at AFD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete or possibly draftify. I disagree that these are all "puff" references - what seems to be more of an issue is that the article is significantly overstated from what the references actually say (for example, the WP article says "he oversaw Comcast's acquisition of AT&T's cable television systems," but the cited reference for that statement says nothing of the kind).  I say weak delete because even a quick Google search shows that he does seem to be an expert that tech media interviews somewhat frequently, which makes me think he must have done something noteworthy to establish himself as an expert, but if he has, I certainly can't find it. Sleddog116 (talk) 15:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Tech experts in media are often just paid mouthpieces from xyz company, so a poor standard by which to measure reliability. I find not much for significant sources on this fellow, other then mentions in passing (as discussed above). Oaktree b (talk) 01:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.