Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J Chappell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Michael J Chappell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 09:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, and at a push redirect to Celtic League (political organisation) and mention him there. Michael Chappell's media coverage is solely restricted minor references relating to statements and attention-seeking on behalf of this organisation. If this article stays, the link the reference to the border between Cornwall and England needs changing - like it or not, the rest of the world considers Cornwall to be part of England. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Celtic League seems to be a minor political movement (though described as a NGO. As such the subject should be judeged against WP:POLITICIAN and clearly fails.  No dount he hopes that his fast (now allegedly 10 days old) will make him notorious.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.