Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael J Slater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. S warm  ♠  04:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Michael J Slater

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nik software is notable. But only being the CEO of that company does not make the subject of the article notable. Google search results only some trivial quotations and passing mentions. Variation 25.2 (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * keep. He was not "only being CEO". Clearly a person did something notable. People are notable for their deeds, not only for their bare asses. - üser:Altenmann >t 22:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * keep He is clearly a Notable person with lot of media coverages.--Khocon (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Notwithstanding the two editors above, a News search does not turn up anything to show notability.  He's quoted in a few articles, many blogs and quite a few press releases. Not a single in-depth article on him.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I suppose as I see nothing better to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  05:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 *  delete much of the coverage is about his company rather than him. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per LibStar. I cannot find in-depth coverage of Slater specifically, only coverage of Nik Software. Jujutacular (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.