Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson (engineer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Michael Jackson (engineer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Vcwatcher with the following rationale "removing notice" (sigh). The sources are, as I said, poor - at best we have an interview in niche magazine and some mentions in passing. Seems like your usual vanity paid-for bio - in the interest of disclosure, I would therefore like to ask User: Vcwatcher is he has any connection with the subject here, and if he is aware of WP:PAID? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Insufficient coverage in sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Incidentally, given the look of the article and the contributions of User:Vcwatcher I'd suggest it's starting to quack like paid editing. --Jack Frost (talk) 12:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.