Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jackson (priest)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Michael Jackson (priest)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a priest in Nottingham, England, who was clearly well educated and busy in the Notingham area, also writing a few journal articles. However, it reads as nothing more than a CV of said person. Speedy deletion tag was removed and PROD template has now been removed (on the basis he is an author of something). The Nottingham Churches website page link is now broken and, failing any particular assertions of notability, he fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Sionk (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless his published works are shown to be notable. Otherwise, fails WP:BIO. Peridon (talk) 13:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no doubt a good man, but really just an ordinary vicar. StAnselm (talk) 21:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I am dubious whether he did much to lift him above the ordinary. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.