Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jardine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Michael Jardine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable character, fictional character pages get deleted and merged all the time, so it makes no sense that this page is still here Sahaib3005 (talk) 10:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Taggart (the article doesn't even have a section for 'characters'). The nom's argument is not the most articulate one I've seen but they are right this character doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. PS. I'd also encourage the nom to consider WP:PROD first for such cases. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Topic fails WP:GNG. There are no sources discussing the character. TTN (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - As the second and later main character of a long running popular TV series, I would have thought there might be scope for an article. However he does not seem to have attracted the kind of coverage that would justify one. Anything there is could likely be covered at Taggart if a section for characters was added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunarc (talk • contribs) 22:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, there doesn't seem to be any significant coverage of the subject in secondary sources. Avilich (talk) 16:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - This discussion was never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the discussion itself.  --Finngall talk  19:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.