Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jenkins (director)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Michael Jenkins (director)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established, doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG nor WP:DIRECTOR. Staberinde (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Staberinde (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   03:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   09:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - He just doesn't seem to be that notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't satisfy any of the WP:DIRECTOR criteria:
 * Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:
 * The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
 * No evidence presented of this.
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
 * No evidence presented of this.
 * The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
 * No evidence presented of this.
 * The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
 * And no evidence presented of this either. --Slashme (talk) 11:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.