Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael John Lewis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A7, no claim of notability. Author even admits he don't meet notability standards, maybe later. Secret account 23:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Michael John Lewis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiography about a local author, whose first book hasn't even been published, who doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Deprodded with the fantastic explanation of "Michael John Lewis".  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I just couldn't believe it when I saw that you nominated this for deletion. I am a hard-working author with two beautiful daughters and an incredibly amazing son. The widely read newspaper The Chronicle Herald did a feature on me. That should mean I am worthy of an article. Just because I don't meet your GNG or NAUTHOR doesn't mean I don't have a page. Isn't it the truth that if a person is remarkable, they are worthy of an article? I have received praise from many of my colleagues. Michael John Lewis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael John Lewis (talk • contribs) 23:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, couldn't find any results for this Michael John Lewis as opposed to other people who have the same name (it is a relatively common name, after all). Also, is an autobiography (User:Michael John Lewis looks exactly the same as this page does). Jinkinson   talk to me  23:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.