Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kaminski (computer scientist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Michael Kaminski (computer scientist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not qualify under WP:ACADEMIC sources consist largely of articles written by the subject, no evidence of bona fide notability per WP:GNG. KDS4444 (talk) 13:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 20:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as the article doesn't pass WP:PROF (unfortunately). H-index < 20 (by manual counting from Google Scholar listings) in a high-citation field.  ACM page records 255 citations over 35 years, which is again not high enough for WP:PROF. Other criteria of WP:PROF don't seem to be applicable. — Stringy Acid (talk) 16:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. A GS h-index of 15 (as far as I can tell) in a highly cited field may be WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. One paper with significant publications ("Finite-memory automata" with Francez, TCS 1994) with other citation counts 50 or below is not enough in computer science for WP:PROF, and his research contributions are the only claim of notability in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   02:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.