Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kannely


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Illumibowl. Without prejudice to including selected content at the target. joe deckertalk 22:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Michael Kannely

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While Illumibowl may be marginally notable, having gotten notice at Engadget and CNET, the designer/promoters don't appear to have any independent notability, or at least aren't "world renowned business experts."  Acroterion   (talk)   01:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: See also Articles for deletion/Matthew Aaron Alexander.


 * Delete. Both creators don't appear to have independent notability from their invention. As such, both their pages should be deleted, or at least redirected to Illumibowl. JudgeRM  15:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Illumibowl, which will enhance that article. This also serves as a valid search term for a redirect. North America1000 00:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead as I found nothing better at all and there's vulnerability of keeping this while having absolutely no signs of any actual independent notability, co-founding that company is not any means of keeping this anyhow whatsoever. SwisterTwister   talk  18:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Illumibowl. I'm not sure if there's anything worth merging, but the history would be in tact if someone wants to merge something. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.