Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kidd (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Michael Kidd (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. Not a notable politician, didn't win a major election. Not a notable author, no notable books. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. gadfium 08:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I found one-sentence mentions of him in a few stories, mostly about an asylum seeker citing concerns about climate change on his barely-above-water-level island, but there don't seem to be any article specifically about him. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and NinjaRobotPirate - SimonLyall (talk) 01:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to have in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, as per the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Being in UK I do not know the cases described, but I do not think that being the lawyer who won a notable case makes a lawyer notable. I see nothing exceptional in his career. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:43, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.