Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael King (graphic designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. The consensus below is that there are sufficient sources to support an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Michael King (graphic designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable, on its face except for an unsourced claim to having gained national acclaim. Tagged for notability over a year ago, and for being an orphan for almost a year. Epeefleche (talk) 04:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: There is a newspaper source linked which goes a long way toward establishing notability. This source, from the Portland Business Journal, would help too. A little work should make for a nice stub. Ideally the nominator should look for sources prior to nominating. -Pete (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Peteforsyth, it is possible to find out more about this interesting artist,, . --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.