Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Konopasek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 04:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Michael Konopasek

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability; Created by self in violation of WP policy. Either reason alone is criteria for deletion. - Davodd (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Self Promotional. Deletion history show original author is Michael Konopasek.
 * Not Notable.


 * Delete Was nominated for an Emmy, which is a decent start, but without third-party coverage, Konopasek doesn't meet the  notability criteria. --I Jethrobot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I wrote this article under a different username, but I could not remember the login, so I'm using a new username. I can say with certainty, because I added the article, it is not self promotional. I am not Konopasek.

Also, I just added two citations for the Emmy nominations from the NATAS website (Emmy organization). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freenation45962 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  00:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment--he was nominated for a Great Lakes Emmy, not an Emmy. Meelar (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.