Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Lückner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Michael Lückner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:BEFORE shows only user generated sources, the sourcing in the article is weak. The subject fails notability guidelines. Less Unless (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi. I created this article a good while ago but to be honest, I'm still not very familiar with the notability guidelines for musicians as I mostly edit footballer articles. I've fleshed out the article a bit with reviews from decent sources. Are the reviews sufficient to demonstrate notability, ? Robby.is.on (talk) 22:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi ! I have looked at the sources you have provided, however to me there's still not enough significant coverage even though there are 2-3 reliable sources. The mentions are rather passing. I still consider the article should be deleted. Sorry. Best, Less Unless (talk) 09:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply, . I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you mean by "passing" mentions. All of the sources are about the artist's Tokyo album and pretty much nothing else. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , you are right, the articles talk about this album, but what do they say about the artist? In my opinion, there's not much information about him and he is frequently mentioned in connection to My Bloody Valentine which he was inspired by composing another album. To me that might be the reason he is mentioned in the English media. However, this is only my opinion, I respect if you and other disagree. Best, Less Unless (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that have been added to the article such as Pop Matters, AllMusic and The Seattle Weekly so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view. Note that The Pitchfork review does not count as it was by a contributor instead of staff editors, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The article can always be expanded later, as with a lot of articles. Firestar464 (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.